Respond to these rapid questions in our Midsommar quiz and we will tell you which Midsommar character you are. Play it now.
One thing is certain: writer/director Ari Aster understands the feeling of suffocating dread in its most profound form. He demonstrated this through a grief-soaked story of ancestral vulnerability (you can’t pick your relatives, can you? ), as evidenced by his terrifying and startlingly confident debut “Hereditary.” It’s true that the film’s demonic mythology, expertly gory images, and creepy miniature models, which cinematographer Pawel Pogorzelski’s camera expertly navigated, were all the stuff of nightmares for many viewers. However, the grudge-filled and deeply claustrophobic domestic helplessness that Aster infused into every shot and line of dialogue in “Hereditary” was just as terrifying as anything else.
This time around, the filmmaker is preoccupied with that peculiar feeling of being out of breath throughout “Midsommar,” a fantastically juicy, post-apocalptic cinematic sacrament that revolves around a fruitless relationship in dizzying circles. This time, we are not crammed into a claustrophobic house of horrors like we were the last time. However, be prepared to feel suffocated by a ravenous family (albeit one of a chosen, cultish kind) on an equal level. In the midst of expansive pastoral landscapes, Aster wants us to crave and kick for oxygen, albeit in a more agoraphobic and less claustrophobic manner than we are accustomed to. When you watch “Midsommar,” you’ll immediately recognize the connective headspace responsible for both stories, which is often alleviated by welcome flashes of comedy but always charged by tight choreography and Pogorzelski’s atmospheric compositions. When you watch “Hereditary,” you’ll immediately recognize the connective headspace responsible for both tales.
This superb psychedelic thriller, which was sown somewhere between an outdoorsy “mother!” and a blindingly lit “Dogville,” as well as a fine, contemporary “The Wicker Man,” is distinguished by Aster’s loosening of thematic restrictions. The film isn’t exactly a journey through space and time, but you can certainly argue that the sun never sets on its cosmically vast subject matter: reaping notions of (white) male privilege, American entitlement (which literally pisses on what isn’t theirs), and, most prominently, female empowerment. And this is also a fitting way to describe the setting of the story, which is a desert with nearly constant sunlight throughout the year. A remote, hidden-from-view village in Hälsingland, Sweden, where we find ourselves among peacefully dressed Hrga people who celebrate summer with initially quaint, but increasingly bizarre and downright terrifying rituals as the season progresses. In Aster’s preferred location, where an endless string of hallucinatory traditions are practiced in broad daylight, there is only a slack sense of yesterday and tomorrow. .
But you shouldn’t waste any more time and start this Midsommar quiz.
The folkloric practices begin in an enticing manner: a deceptive gust of calm (which is brilliantly countered by The Haxan Cloak’s skin-crawling score) blows through the air, while heady drugs dissolve in enticing cups of tea. But how did we end up in the midst of these hippy-dippy proceedings cloaked in white linen in the first place? The film’s second fearless female lead, after Toni Collette, was played by Florence Pugh, who was dealing with something unspeakable as she grieved for her husband and daughter. Danielle Pugh portrays Dani, a graduate student attempting to put some distance between herself and an extreme case of trauma involving her bipolar sister. You might hear her screams in your nightmares after seeing her performance, which is deeply scarred and emotionally unrestricted. “(An absolutely stunning prologue, written with top-notch narrative economy, unravels the details of the tragic ordeal.” Dani isn’t alone in this endeavor. As a matter of fact, she begins her picturesque Scandinavian adventure as an outsider at first, accompanying some fellow academics, a group that includes her self-absorbed longtime boyfriend Christian, who is also a fellow scholar of academia (Jack Reynor, convincingly egotistical). Christian’s friends Josh (William Jackson Harper) and Mark (Will Poulter), who is so hysterically douchey that he earns the jester’s cap that he’ll wear later on, and Pelle (Vilhelm Blomgren), who is the brainchild of the operation and a member of the makeshift family that would host the group, are also included in the group.
Midsommar Quiz
In Sweden, when the clique meets up with Connie and Simon, a couple played by Ellora Torchia and Archie Madekwe, Aster foregoes the aforesaid narrative economy in favor of something sinister, as evidenced by the film’s title. Thanks to the deceptively simple design work of production designer Henrik Svensson and Andrea Flesch’s distressingly repetitive, angelically Nordic-embroidered costumes, the director creates a creepy sense of being trapped in a world of boxy sleeping huts, triangular temples, and elaborate dining settings. When the flower-power euphoria wears off (which never happens quickly), “Midsommar” becomes more reflective. Those who have been victimized vanish one by one, and the giggles take on an even more uncomfortable dimension—you will reach the zenith of your sniggers during a truly hilarious mating ceremony that puts the final nail in the coffin of Dani’s doomed relationship with Christian. It all sounds insane, but you can’t really blame the tourists for not making a more concerted effort to flee, or at the very least to figure out what the cult’s ulterior motives were, given their inexperience. The sneaky hex Aster casts has such a tight hold on both the characters and the audience that it is impossible to escape.
Also, you will find out which character are you in this Midsommar quiz.
The excess in “Midsommar” will cause some people to be uncomfortable. In some ways, Christian and Josh’s scholarly rivalry and racial dynamics, which are only briefly hinted at, are overshadowed by their unburdened surplus of time spent in lengthy customs lines. Although Dani is a surrogate for any woman who has ever excused a rude male, rationalized his unkind words, or ignored his thoughtless non-apologies, the most invigorating reward here is the ultimate sovereignty you will find in Dani. In the liberating final shot of the film, Pugh acknowledges this. And you will be aware of it as well, perhaps to such an extent that her freedom will appear to be therapeutic.
For more personality quizzes check this: Ready Or Not Quiz.
