Respond to these rapid questions in our Brahms The Boy II Quiz and we will tell you which Brahms The Boy II character you are. Play it now.
Recently, there has been an unexpected mini-trend in which horror sequels, which are not typically a strong subgenre, have been surprisingly strong in terms of creativity, with films like “Ouija: Origin of Evil” and “Annabelle: Creation,” both of which were better than the films that came before them. Perhaps it was for this reason that “Brahms: The Boy II” was deemed a decent concept by some in the industry. This individual was completely incorrect.
It’s possible that’s a harsh assessment, but at the very least that individual was incorrect about this version of a sequel that even fans of the original were probably not expecting. When it comes to the fact that “The Boy II” is arguably better than the first film—and even makes more sense—if you haven’t seen the original, if you’re one of those people, you should look away now because the ending will have to be ruined in order to explain the new one. You’ve been warned.
A reasonably ingenious trick, the first film first fooled spectators into believing it was a film about an evil doll before deviating from that narrative in the final scenes. “Brahms: The Boy II” was more straightforward in its narrative thrust than “Brahms: The Boy II,” which follows a woman who is tasked with raising a doll as though it were a real boy and becomes convinced that it is real only to discover that a man is hiding behind a wall in the house where she lives. It’s almost as if someone asked themselves at the outset of the production, “How can we make this even crazier than the ending of the first movie?” Then I worked my way backwards from there. Also, you will find out which character are you in this Brahms The Boy II Quiz.
Brahms The Boy II Quiz
Unfortunately, even stating that question makes “Brahms” sound a lot more interesting than it actually is, which is unfortunate. However, the truth is that it violates a fundamental law of genre filmmaking, which is that even if your picture isn’t going to make much sense, it must be entertaining at the very least. A film that is this tedious and that does not have any narrative coherence is simply horrible. Moreover, there’s a point in the final act when it appears as though “Brahms” might have developed into the zany film that it needed to be in order to at least be memorable, but then it just fizzles out into one of those annoying non-endings that makes even less sense than the nonsense that came before it. Also, you must try to play this Brahms The Boy II Quiz.
Anyway, let us return to the story. Following a horrendously videotaped home invasion, a woman (Katie Holmes), her husband (Owain Yeoman), and their kid Jude (Christopher Convery) relocate to a country estate that will be familiar to fans of the previous film. The couple actually ends up moving into a guest house on the grounds of the estate, which is just one of many poor decisions made here since, while the setting was an excellent feature of the original film, you won’t have the same luck with this one. During his first day at the camp, Jude discovers the doll known as Brahms buried in the woods—which is usually a good omen when your child discovers an eerie doll buried in a coffin with its clothing in the eerie woods with its clothes on. Mom, on the other hand, is cooperative. As a result of the trauma of witnessing the attack on his mother, Jude has become mute, and Brahms appears to help him come to terms with his situation. As well as possibly driving him insane!
About the quiz
The creepier Jude’s stance and dead-eye glances get, mom begins to question if Brahms is possessed and directing Jude about, and director William Brent Bell pushes into the concept far more than he did in the first film in which Brahms is animated. Brahms is possessed and commanding Jude around. Though his eyes and head move in cartoonish, badly drawn ways, you keep telling yourself that it could be a result of mom’s distress, which has been causing her to experience some hallucinations of her own. (In addition, you’re attempting to make the movie more fascinating.) Things get more intense as Jude starts relaying how unhappy Brahmes looking scared and the doll looking creepy. Rinse and repeat as necessary. And it becomes so monotonous and boring that your thoughts begin to wander. (I had this vision of an Annabelle vs. Brahms war movie in my head.) The most significant issue is that there are no stakes. It’s a ghost story without any ghosts; a slasher film without any slashing; an atmosphere without any, well, you get the picture. It’s merely a film with an expression that’s as blank as Brahms’s. And what happens when it finally threatens to fill that empty space with something worthwhile? Before the 90-minute mark has even passed, the credits begin to roll. At the end of the day, they have to leave something for “The Boy III,” right?
S is with his mother and father. A weird person named Joseph (Ralph Ineson) wanders around the grounds with a shotgun, and it’s evident that he either knows something important or is simply there to provide exposition in the final act. (It turns out that he is given the opportunity to accomplish both.)
This picture clearly has certain conceptual elements with the original, including a woman who has been traumatized by violence and who may be on the verge of going insane, but the mood is virtually completely absent. It’s a film in which Katie Holm appears in alternate shots.
For more personality quizzes check this: MHA Heroes Rising Quiz.
